The effect of Philosophy for Children (P4C) activities on the development of moral perception and social rules of preschool children
Abstract views: 935
/ 
PDF downloads: 331
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37291/2717638X.202452392Keywords:
P4C, P4C activity set, Moral perception, Social rules developmentAbstract
The purpose of the study was to examine the effects of P4C implementations on children's perceptions of moral and social rules. The study was carried out with a total of 48 children aged five years old, 23 of them in the experimental group and 25 of them in the control group, attending a public school in the 2023–2024 academic years. A quasi-experimental design was used in the research, and the fully mixed sequential equal status design, one of the mixed research typologies, was applied. The Preschool Children's Conceptions of Moral and Social Rules Scale was applied in the quantitative dimension of the research, and observation, interviews, and anecdotal records constituted the qualitative data collection dimension. Briefly, after the implementation process, the experimental group's perception of moral and social norms improved. In the current study, a substantial difference between the children's moral rule and social rule perceptions after the P4C sessions was discovered when the experimental group's moral rule and social rule perception scale scores were analyzed before and after the implementation. A noticeable improvement in cognitive and social-emotional development was seen. It was determined that positive behaviors improved, particularly in moral situations requiring tolerance, in the experimental group. The study came to the conclusion that teaching children philosophy helps them enhance their critical thinking skills.
References
Ab Wahab, M. K., Zulkifli, H., & Abdul Razak, K. (2022). Impact of philosophy for children and its challenges: A systematic review.Children, 9(11), 1671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/children9111671
Baker, E. R., D’Esterre, A. P., & Weaver, J. P. (2021). Executive function and Theory of Mind in explaining young children’s moral reasoning: A test of the hierarchical competing systems model. Cognitive Development, 58, 101035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101035
Bati, K. (2022). A systematic literature review regarding computational thinking and programming in early childhood education. Education and Information Technology, 27, 2059-2082 (2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10700-2
Bogdan, R. (1973). Participant observation. Peabody Journal of Education, 50(4), 302-308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01619567309537925
Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles. Sage.
Cassidy, C., Christie, D., Marwick, H., Deeney, L., McLean, G., & Rogers, K. (2018). Fostering citizenship in marginalised children through participation in Community of Philosophical Inquiry. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 13(2), 120-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197917700151
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (5th ed.). Sage.
Dumontheil, I. (2014). Development of abstract thinking during childhood and adolescence: The role of rostrolateral prefrontal cortex. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 57-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2014.07.009
Fisher, R. (2008). Teaching thinking. Philosophical enquiry in the classroom (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing.
Fletcher, N. M., Gregory, M. R., Shea, P., & Sykes, A. (2021). The story circle as a practice of democratic, critical inquiry. Childhood and Philosophy, 17, 1-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2021.55722
García-Moriyón, F., González-Lamas, J., Botella, J., Vela, J. G., Miranda-Alonso, T., Palacios, A., & Robles-Loro, R. (2020). Research in moral education: The contribution of P4C to the moral growth of students. Education Sciences, 10(4), 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10040119
Giménez-Dasí, M., Quintanilla, L., & Daniel, M. (2013). Improving emotion comprehension and social skills in early childhood through philosophy for children. Childhood & Philosophy, 9(17), 63-89.
Gorard, S., Siddiqui, N., & See, B. (2017). Can ‘Philosophy for Children’ improve primary school attainment?. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51(1), 5-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12227
Gorard, S., Siddiqui, N., & See, B. H. (2015). Philosophy for children: Sapere, evaluation report and executive summary. Durham: Education Endowment Foundation
Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Technology Research and Development, 29, 75-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766777
Gunes, G., & Sahin, V. (2020). Preschoolers’ thoughts on the concept of time. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 181(4), 293-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2020.1753645
Hamlin, J. K. (2013). Failed attempts to help and harm: Intention versus outcome in preverbal infants’ social evaluations. Cognition, 128(3), 451-474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.04.004
Hamlin, J. K., & Wynn, K. (2011). Young infants prefer prosocial to antisocial others. Cognitive Development, 26, 30-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.09.001
Hamlin, J., Wynn, K. & Bloom, P. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature, 450, 557-559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06288
Hayes, D. (2015). Philosophy for children isn’t real philosophy. https://www.spiked-online.com/2015/07/16/philosophy-for-children-isnt-real-philosophy/
Holsti, O. R. (1968). Content analysis, In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol 2. Addison-Wesley.
Hu, J., Gordon, C., Yang, N., & Ren, Y. (2021).“Once upon a star”: A science education program based on personification storytelling in promoting preschool children’s understanding of astronomy concepts. Early Education and Development, 32(1), 7-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2020.1759011
Institute for the Advancement of Philosophy for Children (n.d). IAPC timeline. https://www.montclair.edu/iapc/iapc-timeline/?
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
Kohlberg, L. (1958). The development of modes of thinking and choices in years 10 to 16 [Unpublished doctorate thesis]. University of Chicago.
Kuhlmeier, V., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2003). Attribution of dispositional states by 12-month-olds. Psychological Science, 14(5), 402-408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.01454
Lafcı-Tor, D. (2023). An investigation of research on philosophy for children (P4C) practices in Turkey: A systematic review. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ University Faculty of Arts and Sciences Journal of Philosophy, 22(3), 703-740.
Lam, C.-M. (2021). The impact of philosophy for children on teachers’ professional development. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 27(7), 642-655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2021.1986693
Laursen, B., & Veenstra, R. (2021). Toward understanding the functions of peer influence: A summary and synthesis of recent empirical research. Journal of Research on Adolescence: The Official Journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence, 31(4), 889–907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12606
Lee, Y-e., Yun, J-eE., Kim, EY., Song, H-j. (2015). The development of infants’ sensitivity to behavioural intentions when inferring others’ social preferences. PLoS ONE, 10(9), e0135588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135588
Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 43(2), 265–275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3
Lin, S., Chien, S., Hsiao, C., Hsia, C., & Chao, K. (2020). Enhancing computational thinking capability of preschool children by game-based smart toys. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 44, 101011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2020.101011
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2nd Ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840272
Lipman, M. (2008). A life teaching thinking. The Institute for the Advancement of Philosophy for Children.
Lipman, M., Sharp, M. A. & Oscanyan, F. S. (1980). Philosophy in the classroom. Temple University Press.
Liu, J., Lewis, G., & Evans, L. (2013). Understanding aggressive behaviour across the lifespan. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 20(2), 156–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2012.01902.x
Margoni, F., & Surian, L. (2016). Mental state understanding and moral judgment in children with autistic spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01478
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Sage.
McGuiness, C. (2005). Teaching thinking: Theory and practice. Pedagogy-learning for teaching. BJEP Monographs Series III, 3, 107-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X61003
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass.
Millett, S., & Tapper, A. (2012). Benefits of collaborative philosophical inquiry in schools. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(5), 546-567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00727.x
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2004). Enhancing the interpretation of significant findings: The role of mixed methods research. The Qualitative Report, 9(4), 770-792.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2007). Sampling designs in qualitative research: Making the sampling process more public. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 238-254.
Oyler, J. (2016). Philosophy with children: The Lipman-Sharp approach to philosophy for children. In: Peters, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_226-2
Özcan, A., & Güngör-Aytar, F. A. (2023). Investigation of moral and social rule conceptions, prosocial behaviors and emotion regulation skills of 60-72 month-old children attending a preschool education institution. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 13(2), 140-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1069780
Patton, M. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.
Piaget, J. (1932,1965). The moral judgment of the child. The Free Press.
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. W.W. Norton & Co. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/11494-000
Piaget, J. (1964). Cognitive development in children: Development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020306
Pressbooks. (n.d.). Psych in real life: Moral reasoning. https://pressbooks.nscc.ca/lumenpsychology/chapter/psych-in-real-life-moral-reasoning/
Qashmer, A. F. (2023). Emotion regulation among 4-6 year-old children and its association with their peer relationships in Jordan. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1180223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1180223
Roversi, V., Cavallo, A., & Contage, D. B. M. (2022). Creating the senses of the earth: The natural breath of the community of inquiry. Childhood & Philosophy, 18, 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2022.66131
Royce, J. R., & Powell, A. D. (1983). A theory of personality and individual differences: Factors, systems and processes. Prentice-Hall.
Secer, Z., & Sari, H. (2006). A comparative analysis of moral and social rule knowledges of the children who attended and did not attend nursery schools in terms of different variables. The Journal of National Education, 172, 126-142.
Sharp, A. M. (1995). Philosophy for children and the development of ethical values. Early Childhood Development and Care, 107, 45-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443951070106
Sharp, A. M. (2009). The community of inquiry as ritual participation. In E. Marsal, T. Dobashi & B. Weber (eds) Children philosophize worldwide: Theoretical and practical concepts (pp. 301-306.). Peter Lang.
Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
Siddiqui, N., Gorard, S., & See, B. H. (2019). Can programmes like Philosophy for Children help schools to look beyond academic attainment? Educational Review, 71, 146-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2017.1400948
Slade, C. (1992). Creative and critical thinking: An evaluation of philosophy for children. Analytic Teaching, 13(1), 25-36.
Smetana, J. (2006). Social domain theory: Consistencies and variations in children’s moral and social judgments. In M. Killen, & J. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 119-154). Erlbaum.
Smetana, J. G. (1981). Preschool children’s conceptions of moral and social rules. Child Development, 52(4), 1333-1336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1981.tb03187.x
Sodian, B., Licata, M., Kristen-Antonow, S., Paulus, M., Killen, M., & Woodward, A. (2016). Understanding of goals, beliefs, and desires predicts morally relevant theory of mind: A longitudinal investigation. Child Development, 87, 1221-1232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12533
Trickey, S., & Topping, K. J. (2004). ‘Philosophy for children’: A systematic review. Research papers in Education, 19(3), 365-380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152042000248016
Vansieleghem, N. (2005). Philosophy for children as the wind of thinking. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39(1), 19-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-8249.2005.t01-1-00417.x
Ventista, O. M. (2017). A literature review of empirical evidence on the effectiveness of Philosophy for Children. In E. Duthie, F.G. Moriyón, R.R. Loro (Eds) Parecidos de familia. propuestas actuales en filosofía para niños/family resemblances. Current proposals in philosophy for children (448–461). Anaya Educación.
Ventista, O. M., & Paparoussi, M. (2016). Introducing a philosophical discussion in your classroom: An example of a community of enquiry in a Greek primary school. Childhood & Philosophy, 12(25), 611-629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2016.24994
Woolley, J. D., & McInnis, M. A. (2015). The development of children’s concepts of invisibility. Cognitive Development, 34, 63-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.12.009
Wu, C. (2021). Training teachers in China to use the philosophy for children approach and its impact on critical thinking skills: A pilot study. Education Sciences, 11(5), Article 206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050206
Wynn, K. (2008). Some innate foundations of social and moral cognition. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind: Foundations and the future (pp. 330-347). Oxford University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195332827.003.0017
Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2014). The moral baby. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 435–453). Psychology Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203581957.ch20
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Sage
Zoabi, M., & Lobont, F. (2022). The P4C approach as a promoter of dialogical creative thinking based on the teachers' perception. Interdisciplinary Research in Counseling, Ethics and Philosophy, 2(6), 1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59209/ircep.v2i6.38
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Childhood, Education & Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
Author(s) must confirm that the Journal of Childhood, Education & Society retains all the copyrights unconditionally and indefinitely to publish articles.
