Promoting decoding among young students with Swedish as a first and second language within a response to intervention model
Abstract views: 915 / PDF downloads: 404
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37291/2717638X.202342282Keywords:
RTI, Swedish as a second language, Reading, Young studentsAbstract
Many young students with Swedish as their second language need support to acquire reading ability. There is a need for evidence-based reading instruction in early reading education for students with Swedish as their first or second language. Therefore, the current study investigated whether early reading education based on a Response to Intervention (RTI) model with a focus on decoding skills can promote reading ability among young students with Swedish as their first or second language. In Grades 1 and 2, 113 students with Swedish as a first and Swedish as a second language were followed. Applying the RTI model, teachers used evidence-based reading instruction in the whole class. Besides, additional instructions were provided in small groups and individually for students with weak decoding. Results of the study showed that the additional instruction provided within the RTI model had the potential to promote decoding, but to a different extent among students with Swedish as their second language. The importance of differentiated instruction, early monitoring and support, a bilingual approach in reading education for second language students, and collaboration between teachers are discussed.
References
Abedi, J., & Gándara, P. (2006). Performance of English language learners as a subgroup in large‐scale assessment: Interaction of research and policy. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 25(4), 36-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2006.00077.x
Arias-Gundín, O., & García Llamazares, A. (2021). Efficacy of the RTI model in the treatment of reading learning disabilities. Education Sciences, 11(5), 209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050209
Arnold, D. H., & Doctoroff, G. L. (2003). The early education of socioeconomically disadvantaged children. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 517-545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.111301.145442
August, D., & Shanahan, T. (2017). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on language-minority children and youth. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315094922
Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271
Cummins, J. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 222–251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543049002222
Cummins, J. (2021). Rethinking the education of multilingual learners: A critical analysis of theoretical concepts. Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800413597
Denton, C. A. (2012). Response to intervention for reading difficulties in the primary grades: Some answers and lingering questions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(3), 232-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412442155
Droop, M., & Verhoeven, L. (2003). Language proficiency and reading ability in first‐and second‐language learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(1), 78-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.38.1.4
Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The science of reading progresses: Communicating advances beyond the simple view of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), 25-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411
Ehri, L. C. (1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In J. L. Metsala, & L. C. Ehri (1st Ed.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 13-50). Routledge.
Ehri, L. C. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 5– 21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.819356
Eikeland, I., & Ohna, S. E. (2022). Differentiation in education: a configurative review. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 8(3), 157-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2022.2039351
Fälth, L., Gustafson, S., Kugelberg, E., & Nordström, T. (2017). LegiLexis formativa bedömningsverktyg-Testmanual [LegiLexis Formative Assessment Tool - Test Manual]. https://legilexi.org/kunskapsbank/artiklar/forskning/utveckling-av-legilexis-tester
Fälth, L., Selenius, H., & Egerhag, H. (2023). A cross-sectional study on reading among young L1 and L2 students in Sweden. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 38(2), 233-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2022.2050973
Felth Sjölund, I., Hed Andersson, P., & Wänblad, M. (2012). Diamantjakten. Lärarhandledning [Diamond hunt. Theacher’s guide. Natur & Kultur. https://www.bokus.com/bok/9789127424418/abc-klubben-ak-2-diamantjakten-lararhandledning/
Felth Sjölund, I., Hed Andersson, P., Wänblad, M., & Lundberg, I. (2011). Den magiska kulan 1. Lärarhandledning [The magic bullet 1. Theacher’s guide. Natur & Kultur. https://www.nok.se/titlar/laromedel-b1/abc-klubben-ak-1/80506f52-69d4-42b3-9eb3-23a332cf5daf
Fien, H., Smith, J. L. M., Baker, S. K., Chaparro, E., Baker, D. L., & Preciado, J. A. (2011). Including English learners in a multitiered approach to early reading instruction and intervention. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 36(3), 143-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508410392207
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it?. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4
Gersten, R., Haymond, K. Newman-Gonchar, R., Dimino, J., & Jayanthi., M. (2020). Meta-analysis of the impact of reading interventions for students in the primary grades. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(2), 401–427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2019.1689591
Gottardo, A., & Mueller, J. (2009). Are first- and second-language factors related in predicting second-language reading comprehension? A study of Spanish-speaking children acquiring English as a second language from first to second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 330-344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014320
Gough, P., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6˗10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104
Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139150484
Haager, D. (2007). Promises and cautions regarding using response to intervention with English language learners. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30(3), 213-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30035565
Hall, C., Steinle, P. K., & Vaughn, S. (2019). Reading instruction for English learners with learning disabilities: What do we already know, and what do we still need to learn?. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2019(166), 145-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20302
Hallin, A. E., Danielsson, H., Nordström, T., & Fälth, L. (2022). No learning loss in Sweden during the pandemic: Evidence from primary school reading assessments. International Journal of Educational Research, 114, 102011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102011
Herbers, J. E., Cutuli, J., Supkoff, L. M., Heistad, D., Chan,C.-K., Hinz, E., & Masten, A. S. (2012). Early reading skills and academic achievement trajectories of students facing poverty, homelessness, and high residential mobility. Educational Researcher, 41(9), 366-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12445320
Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2, 127-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799
Jeon, E. H., & Yamashita, J. (2014). L2 reading comprehension and its correlates: A meta‐analysis. Language learning, 64(1), 160-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12034
Kamps, D., Abbott, M., Greenwood, C., Arreaga-Mayer, C., Wills, H., Longstaff, J., & Walton, C. (2007). Use of evidence-based, small-group reading instruction for English language learners in elementary grades: Secondary-tier intervention. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30(3), 153˗168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30035561
Keuleers, E., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Brysbaert, M. (2015). Word knowledge in the crowd: Measuring vocabulary size and word prevalence in a massive online experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(8), 1665-1692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1022560
Lee, H., Jung, G., & Lee, J. H. (2022). Simple view of second language reading: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26(6), 585-603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2022.2087526
LegiLexi (2023). LegiLexi God Läsförmåga LegiLexi Good reading ability. https://legilexi.org/
Lervåg, A., & Aukrust, V. G. (2010). Vocabulary knowledge is a critical determinant of the difference in reading comprehension growth between first and second language learners. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(5), 612-620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02185.x
Lindamood, P., & Lindamood, P. (1998). The Lindamood phoneme sequencing program for reading, spelling, and speech. PRO-ED.
Lipka, O., & Siegel, L. S. (2012). The development of reading comprehension skills in children learning English as a second language. Reading and Writing, 25, 1873-1898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9309-8
Lovett, M. W., Frijters, J. C., Wolf, M., Steinbach, K. A., Sevcik, R. A., & Morris, R. D. (2017). Early intervention for children at risk for reading disabilities: The impact of grade at intervention and individual differences on intervention outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(7), 889-914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000181
Löwenbrand-Jansson, G. (2018). FonoMix, Munmetoden - Fonologisk multisensorisk läsinlärningsmetod FonoMix - the Oral Method Phonological multisensory reading learning method. Gullow Förlag.
Ludwig, C., Guo, K., & Georgiou, G. K. (2019). Are reading interventions for English language learners effective?. A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(3), 220-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219419825855
Melby‐Lervåg, M., & Lervåg, A. (2011). Cross‐linguistic transfer of oral language, decoding, phonological awareness and reading comprehension: A meta‐analysis of the correlational evidence. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(1), 114-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01477.x
Mellard, D., McKnight, M., & Jordan, J. (2010). RTI tier structures and instructional intensity. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25(4), 217–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2010.00319.x
Nation, K. (2009). Reading comprehension and vocabulary. Beyond decoding. Guilford Press.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/publications/pubs/nrp/Documents/report.pdf
Natur & Kultur (2020). Läshoppet [Reading jump]. https://www.nok.se/titlar/laromedel-b1/lashoppet-lashoppet-niva-1/
Nelson, J. R., Vadasy, P. F., & Sanders, E. A. (2011). Efficacy of a tier 2 supplemental root word vocabulary and decoding intervention with kindergarten Spanish-speaking English learners. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(2), 184-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X11403088
Nilvius, C. (2022). Response to Intervention - en specialdidaktisk modell för att förebygga lässvårigheter: Från samlat forskningsläge till tillämpning i svensk skolkontext [Response to Intervention – a special didactic model preventing reading difficulities. From a research summary to Swedish school context] [PhD thesis]. Linnaeus University. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1659786/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Nilvius, C., Fälth, L., Selenius, H. & Svensson, I. (2023). Examination of a multitiered RtI-model for identifying and supporting students at risk of reading difficulties in primary schools in Sweden [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Department of Pedagogy and Learning, Linnaeus University.
O’Connor, R. E., Bocian, K. M., Beach, K., & Sanchez, T. (2014). Access to a responsiveness to intervention model: Does beginning intervention in kindergarten matter?. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(4), 307–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412459354
Oakhill, J., Cain, K., & Elbro, C. (2014). Understanding and teaching reading comprehension: A handbook. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315756042
Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
Peterson, E.R., Rubie-Davies, C., Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. (2016). Teachers' explicit expectations and implicit prejudiced attitudes to educational achievement: Relations with student achievement and the ethnic achievement gap. Learning and Instruction, 42, 123-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.010
Programme for International Student Assessment. (2015). Programme for International Student Assessment. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/
Programme for International Student Assessment. (2018). Programme for International Student Assessment. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/
Programme for International Student Assessment.(2012). Programme for International Student Assessment. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/
Progress in International Reading Literacy Study. (2011). Progress in International Reading Literacy Study. IEA. https://www.iea.nl/studies/iea/pirls
Progress in International Reading Literacy Study. (2016). Progress in International Reading Literacy Study. IEA. https://www.iea.nl/studies/iea/pirls
Riley, J. L. (1996). The ability to label the letters of the alphabet at school entry: A discussion on its value. Journal of Research in Reading, 19(2), 87-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1996.tb00090.x
Rivera, M. O., Moughamian, A. C., Lesaux, N. K., & Francis, D. J. (2009). Language and reading interventions for English language learners and English language learners with Disabilities. Center on Instruction. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED521569
Schoonen, R., & Verhallen, M. (2008). The assessment of deep word knowledge in young first and second language learners. Language Testing, 25(2), 211-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532207086782
Seymour, P. H., Aro, M., Erskine, J. M., & Collaboration with COST Action A8 Network. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603321661859
Sparks, R. L. (2019). Why reading is a challenge for U.S. L2 learners: The impact of cognitive, ecological, and psychological factors in L2 comprehension. Foreign Language Annals, 52(4), 727-743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12432
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Journal of Education, 189(1-2), 23-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057409189001-204
Swedish Education Act (2010:800). https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/skollag-2010800_sfs-2010-800
Swedish National Agency for Education (2022a). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and school-age educare (revised 2018). https://www.skolverket.se/publikationsserier/styrdokument/2018/curriculum-for-the-compulsory-school-preschool-class-and-school-age-educare-revised-2018
Swedish National Agency for Education (2022b). Search statistics. https://www.skolverket.se/skolutveckling/statistik
Swedish School Ordinance (2011:185). https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/skolforordning-2011185_sfs-2011-185
Taube, K., Fredriksson, U., & Olofsson, Å. (2015). Kunskapsöversikt om läs- och skrivundervisning för yngre elever: Delrapport från SKOLFORSK-projektet Research Review of reading and writing education in early school years. Interim report from SKOLFORSK-project. Vetenskapsrådet [Swedish Research Council]. https://www.vr.se/download/18.2412c5311624176023d25b34/1555424813359/Kunskapsoeversikt-om-laes-och-skrivundervisning-foer-yngre-elever_VR_2015.pdf
Tomlinson, C. A. (2015). Teaching for excellence in academically diverse classrooms. Society, 52, 203-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-015-9888-0
Verhoeven, L. (2000). Components in early second language reading and spelling. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(4), 313-330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0404_4
Verhoeven, L., & van Leeuwe, J. (2012). The simple view of second language reading throughout the primary grades. Reading and Writing, 25, 1805˗1818. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9346-3
Wendick, G. (2018). IntensivLäsning - Upprepad läsning med strukturerade läslistor [Intensive Reading - Repeated reading with structured reading lists]. Wendick Utbildning. https://wendick.se/shop/product/intensivlasning---skollicens-200-1?tm=bestallning
Woore, R. (2010). Thinking aloud about L2 decoding: an exploration of the strategies used by beginner learners when pronouncing unfamiliar French words. Language Learning Journal, 38(1), 3-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730903545210
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Childhood, Education & Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
Author(s) must confirm that the Journal of Childhood, Education & Society retains all the copyrights unconditionally and indefinitely to publish articles.
Funding data
-
Vetenskapsrådet
Grant numbers 2017-06039