Bilingualism matters: Early childhood teachers' attitudes toward children's creativity

Sabha Hakim Allehyani

doi:10.37291/2717638X.202341255

Authors

Sabha Hakim Allehyani Umm al-Qura University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2238-6277

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37291/2717638X.202341255

Keywords:

Acquisition, Bilingual children, Curriculum, English, Subjects

Abstract

Children can learn any language and acquire its skills at a very early age. Creativity is central to the curriculum. Early Childhood (EC) teachers should provide children with appropriate resources to individually spark their imaginations and encourage them to adopt different ideas. The objective of the current study was to determine the attitudes of EC teachers who are teaching bilingual students and integrating creativity into classroom activities. The study adopted the exploratory approach, where a total of 299 EC teachers in the western region of Saudi Arabia participated in this study by filling out a questionnaire. EC teachers believed that there are differences between bilingual boys and girls in creative competencies. Most teachers stated that they did not receive sufficient training and preparation to incorporate creativity into all subjects in EC schools. Teachers in private EC schools showed more positive attitudes toward creativity than teachers in government schools. These findings provide reliable evidence for international research on teachers' attitudes and perceptions toward creativity in bilingual children. Policy makers can also benefit from these results and pay more attention to teacher preparation programs in order to raise their efficiency in supporting and enhancing the creative inclinations of learners.

References

Adams, J. (2000). Taking charge of curriculum: Teacher networks and curriculum implementation. Teachers College Press.

Adesope, O. O., Lavin, T., Thompson, T., & Ungerleider, C. (2010). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the cognitive correlates of bilingualism. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 207–245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310368803

Alkhuzay, S. (2015). Introducing English as a second language to early primary school curriculum in Saudi Arabia. Arab World English Journal, 6(2), 365 – 371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol6no2.28

Allehyani, H. S. (2019). The impact of employing the thinkers' keys strategies on the development of preschoolers' critical and creative thinking toward emergent literacy. Journal of Art, Literature, Humanities and Social Science, 44(1), 224-248.

Allehyani, H. S., & Alfayez, S. (2022). Swinging between policy and preparation: Kindergarten teachers relocating for teaching primary school students in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 12(7), 221-245.

Allehyani, H.S. (2022a). Losing identity: Snapshot of bilingual and bicultural African children in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 17903-17923.

Allehyani, H.S. (2022b). Equity, diversity and inclusion: Practioners' perspectives toward reforming Early Childhood curriculum in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 15448-15480.

Allehyani, H.S. (2022c). Breaking the silence: Revealing the limits of preschool teachers' cultural and linguistic competence (CLC) in Saudi Arabia. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 22(8), 222-234.

Al-Subahi, A. O. (1989). A Communicative-functional English curriculum for intermediate school in Saudi Arabia: A model for English syllabus design and implementation [Unpublished PhD thesis]. University of Edinburgh.

Baer, J. (1991). Generality of creativity across performance domains. Creativity Research Journal, 4(1), 23–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419109534371

Baldauf, R. (2006) Rearticulating the case for micro language planning in a language ecology context. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7(2–3), 147–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2167/cilp092.0

Betancourt, J., Valadez, M.D., Rodríguez-Naveiras, E., Flores, J.F., & Borges, Á. (2022). Differences between creativity and gender in students with high abilities attending a school with total grouping. Children, 9(7), 1081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/children9071081

Bialystok, E. (2005). Consequences of bilingualism for cognitive development. In J. F. Kroll, & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 417–432). Oxford University Press, Inc.

Bialystok, E., & Shapero, D. (2005). Ambiguous benefits: The Effect of bilingualism on reversing ambiguous figures. Developmental Science, 8(6), 595-604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00451.x

Bloomberg, M. (Ed.). (1973). Creativity: Theory and research. College and University Press.

Cachia, R., Ferrari, A., Ala-Mutka, K., & Punie, Y. (2010). Creative learning and innovative teaching: Final report on the study on creativity and innovation in education in the EU member states. EC JRC-IPTS.

Castillo-Vergara, M., Barrios Galleguillos, N., Jofré Cuello, L., Alvarez-Marin, A., & Acuña-Opazo, C. (2018). Does socioeconomic status influence student creativity?. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 142-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.005

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053

Dere, Z. (2019). Investigating the creativity of children in early childhood education institutions. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(3), 652-658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070302

Fidan, T., & Oztürk, I. (2015). The relationship of the creativity of public and private school teachers to their ıntrinsic motivation and the school climate for ınnovation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195(1), 905 – 914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.370

Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.

Gleason, T. R., Jarudi, R. N., & Cheek, J. M. (2003). Imagination, personality, and imaginary companions. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 31(7), 721-737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2003.31.7.721

Gralewski, J. (2016). Teachers’ beliefs about creativity and possibilities for its development in polish high schools: A qualitative study. Creativity, 3(2), 292-329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2016-0019

Gündoğan, A., Meziyet A., & Gönen, M. (2013). The effect of drama on the creative imagination of children in different age groups. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Hacettepe University Journal of Education], 28(2), 206-220.

Han, K., & Marvin, C. (2022). "Multiple creativities? Investigating domain-specificity of creativity in young children". Special Education and Communication Disorders Faculty Publications, 46(2), 98–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620204600203

Hoff, E. V. (2005). Imaginary companions, creativity, and self-image in middle childhood. Creativity Research Journal, 17(2&3), 167-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2005.9651477

Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., Fischer, R., & Christoffels, I. K. (2011). Bilingualism and creativity: Benefits in convergent thinking come with losses in divergent thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(273), 1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00273

Jia, C., Yang, T., Qian, Y., & Wu, X. (2020). The gender differences in science achievement, ınterest, habit, and creativity. Science Education International, 31(2), 195-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v31.i2.9

Karataş, P., & Aktan-Erciyes, A. (2022). Relation between creativity, executive functions and bilingualism. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(Special Issue 1), 240-248.

Kharkhurin, A. V. (2012). Bilingual education and bilingualism. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters Ltd..

Kharkhurin, A. V. (2017). Bilingualism and creativity: An educational perspective. In W. E. Wright, S. Boun, & O. Garcia (Eds.). The handbook of bilingual and multilingual education (pp. 38–55). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118533406.ch3

Lee, H., & Kim, K. H. (2011). Can speaking more languages enhance your creativity? Relationship between bilingualism and creative potential among Korean American students with multicultural link. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(8), 1186–1190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.039

Leikin, M. (2013). The effect of bilingualism on creativity: Developmental and educational perspectives. International Journal of Bilingualism, 17(4), 431–447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006912438300

Leikin, M., & Tovli, E. (2014). Bilingualism and creativity in early childhood. Creativity Research Journal, 26(4), 411–417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.961779

Madhav, A., & Anand, A. (2012). Effect of bilingualism on creativity – An exploratory study. Bilingualism and Creativity, 31(1), 88-96.

Ministry of Education. (2022). Teaching English from the first grade of primary school to enhance students' language abilities from an early age. https://www.moe.gov.sa/en/mediacenter/MOEnews/Pages/english-tech-2021-76.aspx

Naeem, M. (2021). Developmental benefits of bilingual children [bachelor's thesis]. University of Stavanger.

Nikkolaa, T., Kangasb, J., Fongc, Y., & Reunamod, J. (2022). Children’s social orientations as creative processes in early childhood education and care. Journal of Early Childhood Education Research, 11(1), 297–312.

Particia A., & Johnson, D. (2004). Cooperative extension. Colorado State University Press.

Pearson, D., Rouse, H., Doswell, S., Ainsworth, C., Dawson, O., Simms, K, Edwards, L., & Faulconbridge, J. (2001). Prevalence of imaginary companions in a normal child population. Child: Care, Health and Development, 27 (1), 13-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2214.2001.00167.x

Plucker, J. A., & Beghetto, R. A. (2004). Why creativity ıs domain general, why ıt looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 153–167). American Psychological Association. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10692-009

Rashidova, N., & Bobojonova, M. (2019). Childhood bilingualism or what people think about children speaking in two languages. 9th International Conference «Science and practice: A new level of integration in the modern world». Sheffield, UK.

Robinson, (2017). Out of our minds: the power of being creative. Capstone.

Root-Bernstein, M., & Root-Bernstein, R. (2006). Imaginary wordplay in childhood and maturity and its impact on adult creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 405-425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1804_1

Runco M. A. (1986) Divergent thinking and creative performance in gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46(2), 375–384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448604600211

Schmidt, M., & Datnow, A. (2005). Teachers’ sense-making about comprehensive school reform: The influence of emotions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 949–965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.006

Schneider, J. (2014). From the ivory tower to the schoolhouse: How scholarship becomes common knowledge in education. Harvard Education Press.

Šemberger, T., & Čotar Konrad, S. (2022). Preschool teacher’s beliefs about creativity and children creativeness. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 10(1), 37-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1053261

Taylor, M., Carlson, S. M., Maring, B. L., Gerow L., & Charley C. M. (2004). The characteristics and correlates of fantasy in school-age children: Imaginary companions, impersonation, and social understanding. Developmental Psychology, 40(6), 1173-1187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.1173

Vygotsky, L.S. (1990). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Soviet Psychology, 28(1), 84-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405280184

Yemez, N., & Dikilitaş, K. (2022). Development of verbal creativity by bilingual and English as foreign language learners in kindergarten to 8th grade schools. Creativity Studies, 15(1), 25–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2022.12603