Preschoolers’ use and exploration of concepts related to scientific phenomena in preschool

Annika Åkerblom; Kristina Thorshag

doi:10.37291/2717638X.202123115

Authors

Annika Åkerblom Gothenburg University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4125-9775
Kristina Thorshag Gothenburg University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4742-783X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37291/2717638X.202123115

Keywords:

Preschool, Early science, Making sense, Concept creation

Abstract

The study described in this paper concerns science education in preschool, more specifically how young children in preschool settings invent, develop and explore science and scientific concepts in problem-solving and communicative situations. The aim of the paper is to discuss young children´s concept creation and draw conclusions for early science education. The method used was a secondary analysis of empirical material drawn from three previous studies carried out by the authors. Examples of preschool children’s use of language were extracted and was, for the purpose of this study, analyzed with a new focus on children’s use of concepts. The re-analysis draws from Vygotsky’s theoretical framework on children’s conceptual development and appropriation of new concepts (Vygotsky, 1934/1999; Åkerblom 2011) and from the later Wittgenstein (1986) on the role of language meaning in understanding. The findings underline the importance of allowing preschool children to invent, develop and explore science and technology concepts, as well as implications for preschool teachers to create dialogic spaces for the children to do so. The limitations of the study are however that it is based on a limited number of examples and even though it can give implications and point out directions, is not conclusive and should be followed by further research.

References

Åkerblom, A. (2011). Children making sense of physical phenomena. Lund University.

Åkerblom, A. (2015). Exploring the pedagogic relation: Supporting six-year olds in making sense of physical motion. Nordic EarlyChildhood Education Research, 11(6), 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7577/nbf.993

Åkerblom, A., & Pramling, N. (2019). Dramatisering i spänningsfältet mellan som om och som är och sexåringars meningsskapande av kemiska begrepp och processer. [Dramatizing in the tension-field between as if and as is and six-year-olds’ meaning making about chemical concepts and processes.] Educare-vetenskapliga skrifter, (2), 58-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24834/educare.2019.2.4

Åkerblom, A., & Pramling, N. (2020). Children’s understanding of representations of basic chemistry after participating in an early childhood drama pedagogical activity. Journal Of Early Childhood Education Research, 9(2), 290-313.

Åkerblom, A., Součková, D., & Pramling, N. (2019). Preschool children’s conceptions of water, molecule, and chemistry before and after participating in a playfully dramatized early childhood education activity. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 14, 879–895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-018-9894-9

Andersson, K., & Gullberg, A. (2014). What is science in preschool and what do teachers have to know to empower children?. Cultural studies of science education, 9(2), 275-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9439-6

Andersson, K., Gullberg, A., Danielsson, A., Scantlebury, K., & Hussénius, A. (2020). Chafing borderlands: Obstacles for science teaching and learning in preschool teacher education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(2), 433-452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09934-x

Donaldson, M. (1978). Children’s minds. Fontana.

Driver, R., & Easley, J. A. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267808559857

Duit, R. (2009). Bibliography – Students’ and Teachers’ Conceptions and Science education. http://www.ipn.unikiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse

Fleer, M. (2009). Understanding the dialectical relations between everyday concepts and scientific concepts within play-based programs. Research in Science Education, 39, 281-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9085-x

Fleer, M., & Pramling, N. (Eds) (2015). Knowledge construction in early childhood science education. In A cultural-historical study of children learning science (pp. 67-93). Springer DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9370-4_5

Golumbia, D. (2015). The language of science and the science of language: Chomsky’s Cartesianism. Diacritics, 43(1), 38-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.2015.0004

Gomes, J., & Fleer, M. (2018). Is science really everywhere? Teachers’ perspectives on science learning possibilities in the preschool environment. Research in Science Education, 50(5), 1961-1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9760-5

Güneş, G., & Şahin, V. (2020). Preschoolers' thoughts on the concept of time. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 181(4), 293-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2020.1753645

Häikklä, M., & Sahlström, F. (2003). Om användning av videoinspelning i fältarbete. [On the use of video recording in field work] Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, 8(1-2), 24-41.

Hobson, S., Trundle, K., & Saçkes, M. (2010). Using a Planetarium software program to promote conceptual change with young children. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(2), 165-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9189-8

Hundeide, K. (1977). Piaget i kritisk lys. [Piaget in a critical light] Cappelen.

Kalogiannakis, M., Nirgianaki, G.-M., & Papadakis, St. (2018). Teaching magnetism to preschool children: the effectiveness of picture story reading. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46(5), 535-546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-017-0884-4

Lewis, G., Jones, B., & Baker, C. (2012). Translanguaging: Developing its conceptualisation and contextualisation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 18(7), 655-670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2012.718490

Lgr11. (2018). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and school-age educare (revised 2018). National Agency for Education. https://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=3984

Lpfö 18. (2018). Curriculum for the preschool. National Agency for Education. https://www.skolverket.se/download/18.6bfaca41169863e6a65d5aa/1553968116077/pdf4001.pdf

Mawson, B. (2010). Children’s developing understanding of technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(1), 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-008-9062-8

Milne, L., & Edwards, R. (2011). Young children’s views of the technological process: an exploratory study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23, 11-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9169-1

Nordén, B., & Avery, H. (2020). Redesign of an outdoor space in a Swedish preschool: Opportunities and constraints for sustainability education. International Journal of Early Childhood, 52(3), 319-335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-020-00275-3

Ødegaard, M. (2003). Dramatic science. A critical review of drama in science education. Studies in Science Education, 39(1), 75–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260308560196

Osborne, R., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in Science. The Implications of Children's Science. Heinemann Educational Books.

Piaget, J. (1969). The child’s conception of time. (AJ Pomerans Trans.). Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1946).

Piaget, J. (1971). The language and thought of the child. (M. & R. Gabain Trans.) Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1929).

Piaget, J. (1973). The child’s conception of the world. (J. & A. Tomlinson Trans.) Paladin. (Original work published 1923).

Pramling, N. (2006). 'The clouds are alive because they fly in the air as if they were birds': A re-analysis of what children say and mean in clinical interviews in the work of Jean Piaget. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21(4), 453-466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173514

Pramling, N. (2015). The nature of scientific educational encounters. In M. Fleer and N. Pramling (Ed.) A cultural-historical study of children learning science (pp. 179-195). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9370-4_11

Pramling, N., & Pramling Samuelsson, I. (Eds)(2011). Educational encounters: Nordic studies in early childhood didactics (International perspectives on early childhood education and development, v. 4). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1617-9

Robbins, J. (2005). ‘Brown paper packages’? A sociocultural perspective on young children’s ideas in science. Research in Science Education, 35, 151–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-0092-x

Rogers, A., & Russo, S. (2003). Blocks: A commonly encountered play activity in the early years, or a key to facilitating skills in science,maths and technology. Investigating, 19(1), 17-20.

Saçkes, M. (2014). How often do early childhood teachers teach science concepts? Determinants of the frequency of science teaching in kindergarten. European early childhood education research journal, 22(2), 169-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2012.704305

Saçkes, M. (2015a). Young children’s ideas about earth and space science concepts. In K. Trundle and M. Saçkes (Eds.), Research in early childhood science education (pp. 35-65). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9505-0_3

Saçkes, M. (2015b). Kindergartners’ mental models of the day and night cycle: Implications for instructional practices in earlychildhood classrooms. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(4), 997-1006.

Saçkes, M., Flevares, L., & Trundle, K. C. (2010). Four- to six-year-old children’s conceptions of the mechanism of rainfall. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25(4), 536-546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.01.001

Saçkes, M., Trundle, K., Bell, R., & O'Connell, A. (2011). The influence of early science experience in kindergarten on children's immediate and later science achievement: Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 217-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20395

Sherif, V. (2018). Evaluating preexisting qualitative research data for secondary analysis. Forum, Qualitative Social Research, 19(2), art 7

Siry, C. & Gorges, A. (2020). Young students' diverse resources for meaning making in science: Learning from multilingual contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 42(14), 2364-2386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1625495

Siry, C. (2011). Exploring the significance of resource-rich views in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6(4), 1019–1029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-011-9353-3

Siry, C. (2013). Exploring the complexities of children’s inquiries in science: Knowledge production through participatory practices. Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2407-2430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9364-z

Siry, C., & Kremer, I. (2011). Children explain the rainbow: Using young children’s ideas to guide science curricula. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 643-655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9320-5

Smith, E. (2008). Pitfalls and promises: The use of secondary data analysis in educational research. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(3), 323-339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2008.00405.x

Sundberg, B., Areljung, S., Due, K., Ekström, K., Ottander, C., & Tellgren, B. (2018). Opportunities for and obstacles to science in preschools: Views from a community perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 40(17), 2061-2077. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1518615

Thorshag, K. (2019). Barns teknikskapande: en studie av bygg-och konstruktionslek i förskolan [Children’s technology creation. A study of building- and construction play in preschool.] (Doctoral dissertation). Malmö universitet.

Tu, T. (2006). Preschool science environment: What is available in a preschool classroom?. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(4), 245-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-005-0049-8

Veresov, N. (2004) Vygotsky before Vygotsky: The Path to the Cultural-historical Theory of Human Consciousness (1917-1927): Historical and Methodological Analysis. 1998. Print. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis Ser. E, Scientiae Rerum Socialium, 30.

Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1) 45-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3

Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. W. Rieber and A. S. Carton (Eds.) The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology, 39- 285. (N. Minick, Trans.). Plenum. (Original work published 1934)

Vygotsky, L. S. (1999). Tänkande och språk [Thinking and speech] (K. Öberg Lindsten, Trans.) Daidalos. (Original work published 1934)

Vygotsky, L.S. (1995). Fantasi och kreativitet I barndomen [Fantasy and creativity in childhood] (K. Öberg Lindsten, Trans.). Daidalos. (Original work published 1930)

Vygotsky, L.S. (1998). Child psychology. In R. W. Rieber and A. S. Carton (Eds.) The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. Vol. 5. (M. J. Hall, Trans.). Plenum. (Original work published 1935)

Wittgenstein, L. (1968). Philosophical investigations (3rd ed). (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.) Basil Blackwell. (Original work published 1953)